Why spend $700K on Arbolitos?
The Poway city staff report for the Conditional Use Permit to allow lighting Arbolitos Park for nighttime sports activities has been issued. It is too late for me to urge that lights not be allowed at Arbolitos Park, but I would like to urge our City Council to consider a few items as they review the staff report.
More than one councilmember stated at the Sept. 7 council meeting that they were committed to an 8 p.m. curfew for lights at Arbolitos. Now is the time for them to remember those commitments and change the staff recommendation from a 9 p.m. curfew back to that 8 p.m. curfew.
PYSL only asked for a practice field. The staff report recommends game- level lighting for Arbolitos Park. Now is the time for the council to change to practice-level lighting, which the staff report says would have less impact on the neighbors. The physical installation for the lights should be practice-level only, not a dual level with a switch.
PYSL promised $350,000 toward lighting Arbolitos Park. The council should require PYSL to make good on that promise, rather than accept the staff recommendation to appropriate $700,000 for the city to fund the entire project. There are other parks in Poway where that money could be put to good use.
I encourage Powegians to attend the Oct. 19 council meeting and watch the actions of their councilmembers as they think about who to support in the upcoming election.
Tom Tucker
Poway
Stavros best choice for Poway Mayor
To those who think the recall shook our appointed mayor into being more forthright and ethical, you are wrong. In the last five months Don Higginson has dropped to an all-time low in his treatment and consideration of his constituents.
Higginson was the lesser of all evils when Cafagna anointed him. Many of Higginson’s current supporters were recall supporters. I find it disturbing that anyone who supported the recall can now look at Higginson and not understand that Betty Rexford did not act in a bubble, she had inside help.
The alternative is Nick Stavros. Nick is articulate in his understanding Poway political business in the past and why we desperately need change moving forward. Nick has repeatedly stepped up to be the voice of reason only to be dismissed with a bang of a contemptuous gavel. I was particularly impressed with his ideas for our redevelopment dollars and the conflict of interest between our city manager and City Council.
Is Higginson our best choice? No, Stavros is. South Poway may be the redheaded stepchild to north Poway. Until south Poway neighborhoods are improved, we will become the rotting fish that fouls the north’s air. South Poway issues will become north Poway issues — unmanageable traffic as commuters fight to get around the Poway Road gridlock, increased crime as mega-centers are built on land that was never intended for big-box development, and destruction of our last vestiges of open space. I believe Stavros is the new leadership for Poway.
Clariece Tally
Poway
Friday, October 15, 2010
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
"integrity-be-damned" Boo
Below is an excerpt from Bob Emery's editorial published October 13.
Emery retired from the City Council after serving 28 years
"And an integrity-be-damned, “let’s light up the night” boo hiss to the Poway City Council for reneging on a long-standing city policy that prohibited the lighting of neighborhood parks. The council apparently gave its go ahead on Sept. 7 to lighting Arbolitos Park with 70-foot poles, when it directed staff to bring back a revised conditional use permit on Oct. 19. Not only does this action fly in the face of numerous promises to residents in the past not to light neighborhood parks, it opens the flood gates for numerous requests by all sports leagues to request equal treatment. As stated by soccer parent Ginger Couvrette, “We need more lighted fields, not just for soccer but for other teams, too.” I asked in a previous column, what’s next, Starridge Park, Valle Verde Park, and Aubrey Park? The possibilities are endless."
To see the full article, click here.
Emery retired from the City Council after serving 28 years
"And an integrity-be-damned, “let’s light up the night” boo hiss to the Poway City Council for reneging on a long-standing city policy that prohibited the lighting of neighborhood parks. The council apparently gave its go ahead on Sept. 7 to lighting Arbolitos Park with 70-foot poles, when it directed staff to bring back a revised conditional use permit on Oct. 19. Not only does this action fly in the face of numerous promises to residents in the past not to light neighborhood parks, it opens the flood gates for numerous requests by all sports leagues to request equal treatment. As stated by soccer parent Ginger Couvrette, “We need more lighted fields, not just for soccer but for other teams, too.” I asked in a previous column, what’s next, Starridge Park, Valle Verde Park, and Aubrey Park? The possibilities are endless."
To see the full article, click here.
Straw Man Surfaces
In the online Pomorado News story it is reported that the statements made by the city council about shutting off the flood lights over the Arbolitos Flood Control Basin at 8:00 p.m. is now going to be discussed as 9:00 p.m. This has been offered as a "concession to the neighbors."
Let this not be a diversion from the original intent of this issue. The real issue isn't what time the flood lights will be turned off, but whether there should be lights in the first place.
It is again obvious that some behind the scenes operatives have been lobbying "the staff" and the city manager to make a recommendation to the city council to make changes. The city council, albeit incorrectly, made another decision at the last council meeting - to obviate the original "concession to the neighbors" to "not put lights over the fields."
How insulting is this new "concession to the neighbors?"
Once the city council made that new decision, the back room politics were pressed again to change what the council said "off at 8:00 p.m." Hence, this new change. How soon will it be that the backroom dealings will change that again to 10:00 p.m.
This Straw Man tactic to continually pressure "the staff" into doing what they want will continue.
Now, let's also review what they said. They offered $350,000 to help defray the costs. Show me the money. Want to guess who is going to foot the full bill? You the taxpayer.
See the full news article here.
Let this not be a diversion from the original intent of this issue. The real issue isn't what time the flood lights will be turned off, but whether there should be lights in the first place.
It is again obvious that some behind the scenes operatives have been lobbying "the staff" and the city manager to make a recommendation to the city council to make changes. The city council, albeit incorrectly, made another decision at the last council meeting - to obviate the original "concession to the neighbors" to "not put lights over the fields."
How insulting is this new "concession to the neighbors?"
Once the city council made that new decision, the back room politics were pressed again to change what the council said "off at 8:00 p.m." Hence, this new change. How soon will it be that the backroom dealings will change that again to 10:00 p.m.
This Straw Man tactic to continually pressure "the staff" into doing what they want will continue.
Now, let's also review what they said. They offered $350,000 to help defray the costs. Show me the money. Want to guess who is going to foot the full bill? You the taxpayer.
See the full news article here.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
An Open Letter
An Open Letter to the members of the Poway City Council
Reference: Arbolitos Flood Control Basin Lighting
Recently, in an umpire's decision in calling a runner "safe" and in turn denying a pitcher a perfect game, much was made about the call. It included petitioning the commissioner of baseball to reverse the decision.
By definition a decision is the final word on something. In the baseball case the commissioner accepted that definition by not reversing what was obviously a mistake. The commissioner understood that changing a decision sets a precedent that future decisions are in peril and would be cause for much consternation.
In the current voter booklet, the current Mayor of Poway repeats the word "decision" twice, but doesn't seem to understand its meaning.
Unlike the baseball issue, it was not a mistake by stating that lights would not be installed to gain commitment from the neighbors of the Rancho Arbolitos area to allow the flood control basin be used as a sports field.
That commitment was part of the reasoning for the "decision," which the Mayor seems want to ignore. He mentioned at the September 7th council meeting that he participated in making a decision then and was making a new decision to go ahead and ignore his earlier commitment to the neighbors in the area.
It is obvious that there is political reasoning to reverse this decision. There is a large number of strident people that outweigh in numbers those of the Arbolitos neighborhood. Politically, it's better to gratify larger numbers of potential voters than the smaller number and prior commitments or decisions be damned.
Changing the decision sets several precedents, among them being that a decision is not really a decision, but something that is less. It teaches everyone including the children of Poway that a politician will do or say anything but not really mean it. And that any decision the City Council makes today is subject to pressure of special interest groups to be changed in the future.
The Mayor is correct, it was not a "promise" that was made, it was a "decision."
Unfortunately, making then reversing a decision seems counter to the "Respect" and "Honor" mentioned in the Poway City Council code of ethics. Those words are something the commissioner of baseball, Bud Selig, and the umpire, Jim Joyce, so readily demonstrated to the children of Poway and the world were not just words, but a commitment to ethical behavior.
.
Reference: Arbolitos Flood Control Basin Lighting
Recently, in an umpire's decision in calling a runner "safe" and in turn denying a pitcher a perfect game, much was made about the call. It included petitioning the commissioner of baseball to reverse the decision.
By definition a decision is the final word on something. In the baseball case the commissioner accepted that definition by not reversing what was obviously a mistake. The commissioner understood that changing a decision sets a precedent that future decisions are in peril and would be cause for much consternation.
In the current voter booklet, the current Mayor of Poway repeats the word "decision" twice, but doesn't seem to understand its meaning.
Unlike the baseball issue, it was not a mistake by stating that lights would not be installed to gain commitment from the neighbors of the Rancho Arbolitos area to allow the flood control basin be used as a sports field.
That commitment was part of the reasoning for the "decision," which the Mayor seems want to ignore. He mentioned at the September 7th council meeting that he participated in making a decision then and was making a new decision to go ahead and ignore his earlier commitment to the neighbors in the area.
It is obvious that there is political reasoning to reverse this decision. There is a large number of strident people that outweigh in numbers those of the Arbolitos neighborhood. Politically, it's better to gratify larger numbers of potential voters than the smaller number and prior commitments or decisions be damned.
Changing the decision sets several precedents, among them being that a decision is not really a decision, but something that is less. It teaches everyone including the children of Poway that a politician will do or say anything but not really mean it. And that any decision the City Council makes today is subject to pressure of special interest groups to be changed in the future.
The Mayor is correct, it was not a "promise" that was made, it was a "decision."
Unfortunately, making then reversing a decision seems counter to the "Respect" and "Honor" mentioned in the Poway City Council code of ethics. Those words are something the commissioner of baseball, Bud Selig, and the umpire, Jim Joyce, so readily demonstrated to the children of Poway and the world were not just words, but a commitment to ethical behavior.
.
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
What follows is detail ...
supporting data, and opinion in support of the summary above.
If you only read the summary and maybe click on some of the links within it you will get the picture.
If you only read the summary and maybe click on some of the links within it you will get the picture.
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Opinion Piece. Published in MyLocalNews
Council sets bad example
What the City Council did Sept. 7 (by approving lights at the Arbolitos flood control basin) was demonstrate to the children of Poway that it is OK to make a promise, then not keep it.
The council did this by hiding behind the language of a “conditional use permit,” and the mentality of granting variances. They rendered a promise as worthless since a) most of them didn’t make the promise personally, and b) they bent to the very vocal and strident minority community pressure.
But, a promise is not an ordinance. A promise is not a something that is either mandated by ordinance or something to be evaluated as part of a variance. Keeping a promise is an issue of moral integrity and ethical behavior — there is no such thing as promise with a variance.
Don Nieto
Poway
Friday, September 3, 2010
Opinion Piece. Published in MyLocalNews
A picture of the Flood Control Basin at work ; January 21, 2010
Who will repair turf?
A letter sent out by the city says the Sept. 7 City Council agenda will include “Consideration of artificial turf and lights at Arbolitos Sports Field.”
Aside from the fact that placing artificial turf will cost a lot of taxpayer money, the city seems to forget that this place is not a sports field, but a flood control basin first. Photos taken the last time such flooding took place show the basin did its job.
Assuming that artificial turf was placed in the flood control basin, what then would be the additional cost to the taxpayers of Poway to repair or replace the artificial turf when the next heavy rain occurs?